Turbocharge Your IT Journey: Ace the Cisco Certified Network Pro Test 2025 – Network Ninja Style!

Question: 1 / 655

Which of the following statements is true regarding Stateful NAT64?

It provides a one-to-one mapping between addresses

It is not scalable compared to Stateless NAT64

The correct option reflects that Stateful NAT64 is indeed not as scalable compared to its Stateless counterpart. Stateful NAT64 maintains a database of active translations and keeps track of session states, which could lead to performance limitations as the number of translations increases. In contrast, Stateless NAT64 operates without maintaining this database, making it more efficient in scenarios with high volumes of traffic or when rapid scalability is required.

Stateful NAT64 is often useful in situations where connection tracking is important, such as when dealing with applications that rely on maintaining sessions. However, this connection tracking introduces overhead that can hinder scalability, particularly in networks requiring thousands of simultaneous connections. This makes understanding the limitations of Stateful NAT64 crucial for network design and management, especially when compared to Stateless NAT64, which is more suited for high-demand environments where scalability is essential.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

It uses static mappings for IPv4

It has low overhead in mapping

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy